Document reconciliation
A consistent view of asset identifiers, configuration, quantities and amounts across the selected file.
Origination & Disbursement Assurance
A disbursement file with the evidence attached.
Connect the approved asset, supplier quotation, invoice, inspection and delivery record.
Finance & Asset Risk Design partner programme
edge. Origination assuranceIllustrative
Source record
Supplier invoice
Chassis…A7K204
BodyRefrigerated
InvoiceINV-204-01
Inspection extract
Inspection record
Chassis…A7K204
BodyInsulated
SourceINS-204-02
Body descriptions differ. Commissioning evidence is required.
Identity checks3 matchedReview queue1 exception
What you receive
Inside the disbursement review.
Prioritised exceptions
Differences tied to source passages and the institution’s agreed review rules.
Reviewer decisions
An account of accepted explanations, additional evidence and unresolved items.
An illustrative engagement
A different body in the delivery file
A application specifies one body configuration while the delivery record describes another. The review needs to establish whether the difference is approved and material.
The review file connects
Explore the working sampleProposed use case · not a customer result01
Sanctioned configuration
02
Body-builder invoice
03
Delivery and inspection evidence
How it works
From the source to the receiving team.
- 01
Define the checks
Agree the origination stage, document set and institution-specific escalation rules.
- 02
Match the file
Link the application, sanction, supplier and delivery records for each selected case.
- 03
Inspect discrepancies
Present source-backed exceptions for the authorised reviewer to confirm or dismiss.
- 04
Evaluate the queue
Compare review effort, confirmed findings and false alarms with the existing process.
Scope & evaluation
Agree the evidence.
Define a useful result.
Use the details below to assess fit with your workflow.
01 Evidence requirements5 inputs
- Application and sanctioned asset details
- Dealer and body-builder quotations
- Invoices and equipment identifiers
- Inspection and delivery records
- Approved review rules and historical findings
02 Evaluation measures4 measures
- Confirmed exception rate
- False alarms per reviewed case
- Review and rework time
- Unresolved evidence before approval
03 Scope and outputs in detail
The programme examines consistency across a commercial-asset transaction. It supports origination or post-disbursal checks by making the relationship between the sanctioned asset, supplied equipment and delivery evidence explicit. A discrepancy is a review question until it has been investigated.
Outputs to assess
- A cited configuration comparison
- The relevant approval question
- A record of the reviewer’s accepted explanation
Scope, permissions, integrations and acceptance criteria are agreed before work begins. Your authorised team retains the institutional decision.
Questions
Does an exception establish fraud?
An exception identifies a discrepancy or missing evidence. Its cause and significance require investigation under the institution’s process.
Can our existing rules be used?
Yes. The engagement maps the selected checks and policy references to the available documents, with the institution approving interpretations and escalation rules.
How does the pilot avoid creating an unmanageable queue?
The review evaluates false positives and prioritisation against the team’s capacity. Checks are adjusted or withdrawn when they do not support useful review.
The next conversation
Start with this workflow.
Bring a representative set of records and the team responsible for assessing the output.
Start a conversationTalk to the desk.
Tell us who you are and the decision you are pricing. The first conversation costs nothing. A reply comes on working days.
Or write to [email protected].