Duty and constraint baseline
A consistent statement of the work, service level and infrastructure constraints.
Fleet Capital & Transition Planning
Compare the fleet before you commit.
Compare replacement, refurbishment, leasing, outsourcing and electrification on a consistent operating basis.
Enterprise & PSU Performance Design partner programme
edge. Investment comparisonIllustrative
Diesel optionElectric option
| Period | Diesel | Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Buy | 40 | 62 |
| Year 1 | 53.2 | 69.2 |
| Year 2 | 66.4 | 76.4 |
| Year 3 | 79.6 | 83.6 |
| Year 4 | 92.8 | 90.8 |
| Year 5 | 106 | 98 |
Annual distance60,000 kmDiesel energy₹22 / kmElectric energy₹12 / km
What you receive
A complete fleet investment comparison.
Complete-option comparison
Offers and scenarios with common cost boundaries, dates and supplier confirmations.
Investment conditions
The assumptions, dependencies and outstanding commitments requiring approval or further evidence.
An illustrative engagement
Renewing a regional distribution fleet
A shipper compares replacement and lease options for a defined delivery schedule, including a commercial EV option with depot charging requirements.
The review file connects
Explore the working sampleProposed use case · not a customer result01
Route and payload history
02
Complete supplier offers
03
Depot and funding constraints
How it works
From the source to the receiving team.
- 01
Define the operating requirement
Agree the fleet boundary, duty, service objectives and decision timetable.
- 02
Assemble viable packages
Review vehicle, body, infrastructure, service and funding offers.
- 03
Test the economics
Examine utilisation, cost, downtime and residual sensitivities.
- 04
Prepare the approval
Deliver the recommendation and conditions, with a plan to review subsequent performance.
Scope & evaluation
Agree the evidence.
Define a useful result.
Use the details below to assess fit with your workflow.
01 Evidence requirements5 inputs
- Routes, loads and operating schedules
- Fleet condition and maintenance history
- Vehicle, body and service quotations
- Energy and infrastructure requirements
- Funding and investment criteria
02 Evaluation measures4 measures
- Comparable and confirmed offers
- Material conditions resolved before approval
- Sensitivity of service and cost outcomes
- Actual operation against the approved case
03 Scope and outputs in detail
The programme starts with loads, routes, schedules and required availability. It evaluates complete packages, including bodies, energy, charging or fuelling, maintenance and financing. The approved case can then be compared with actual operating results.
Outputs to assess
- A comparable operating account
- Cost and availability scenarios
- An investment recommendation with conditions
Scope, permissions, integrations and acceptance criteria are agreed before work begins. Your authorised team retains the institutional decision.
Questions
Can different powertrains and ownership models be compared?
Yes, where they can meet the defined duty and suitable evidence is available. Costs and responsibilities are represented consistently for each viable option.
How are emissions benefits treated?
Any included estimate states its boundary, activity data, factors and assumptions. The engagement defines the methodology and specialist review required for the intended use.
Can the programme monitor the fleet after purchase?
A follow-on scope can compare actual use, cost and availability with the approved investment case using the organisation’s authorised operating records.
The next conversation
Start with this workflow.
Bring a representative set of records and the team responsible for assessing the output.
Start a conversationTalk to the desk.
Tell us who you are and the decision you are pricing. The first conversation costs nothing. A reply comes on working days.
Or write to [email protected].